Click here to go to the Nevcon Accounting Services home page.
What's New with Nevcon Accounting
Services Offered by Nevcon Accounting
Resources Provided by Nevcon Accounting
Tax Centre Forms, Links, Resources and More
About Nevcon Accounting

Article

Understanding the Disability Tax Credit

Return to Financial Articles index.

For individuals who must contend with disabilities every day, life is surely no picnic, and it would be nice if the government would recognize this fact and extend some compassion to our fellow taxpayers who suffer from ailments the majority of us cannot truly comprehend. Unfortunately, each day the Tax Court of Canada hears cases from individuals pertaining to the Disability Tax Credit who are left wondering about the compassion that our legislators show to our fellow citizens. This article will examine the stringent definitions and rules pertaining to this section of the Act and point out just how limiting such regulations have become.

The disability amount is $4,233 on the 1997 Income Tax and Benefit Return, translating to a credit of about $1,100 for combined federal-provincial income tax purposes in most provinces. If the taxpayer does not need the full credit, provisions in the Act allow it to be transferred to a spouse or other supporting person who could otherwise claim him as a dependant.

The statutory requirements are as follows:

  1. the individual must have a severe and prolonged mental or physical impairment;
  2. the effects of the impairment are such that they affect the individual’s ability to perform life’s basic daily living activities;
  3. a medical doctor (or optometrist in the case of sight impairment) has certified on a prescribed form (T2201) that the individual meets the two conditions outlined above and the taxpayer must have filed this certificate for the taxation year in which the credit is being claimed; and
  4. the taxpayer is precluded from claiming any monies paid for an attendant or care in a nursing home incurred in the year.
Over the years, these provisions have come to be interpreted in a very narrow way. For example:
  1. above has been defined by the courts to mean that the impairment must have lasted or be expected to last for a continuous period of at least twelve months while

  2. has come to refer to the fact that the taxpayer is suffering from his disability, even with therapy and the use of appropriate devices and medication, at least 90% of the time.

Basic activities of daily living have been outlined to mean:

  1. perceiving, thinking and remembering;
  2. feeding and dressing oneself;
  3. speaking in a manner that can be understood by another individual within a quiet setting;
  4. hearing so as to understand another individual within a quiet setting;
  5. bowel or bladder functioning; and
  6. walking a distance of one hundred metres without having to stop and rest.
Noticeably excluded from this list are working, housekeeping or the ability to participate in any social or recreational activities.

The individual must be legally blind, unable to perform any one of the above activities, or require an inordinate amount of time to do so. The fact that he may not be able to perform all of these basic activities at all times, does not, of itself, assure that the taxpayer will qualify for the credit.

The requirement of certification by a medical doctor has been expanded to include such medical practitioners as chiropractors, therapists, dietitians and others so long as they are licensed to practice in your province. Revenue Canada, however, reserves the right to access doctors from Health Canada to assist them with the specific medical issues involved.

In 1995 along, nearly 550,000 taxpayers applied for the credit on their income tax returns. Most of these claims were accepted by Revenue Canada. But there were other seemingly legitimate claims that were rejected due to the complexity and restrictiveness of the statutes. Revenue Canada has historically insisted upon strict application of the criteria. The problem appears to be one of subjective applications of provisions (a) and (b) above which the law does not allow to be applied with any personal sympathy for the afflicted taxpayer involved.

Note: The provided articles highlight tax, accounting and other financial matters in general terms. Nevcon recommends that no action be taken based solely on the basis of information contained in these articles. Specific professional advice should be obtained as individual circumstances must always be taken into account.

Article ©1998 The Quarterly Dividend
Reprinted with permission

Return to Financial Articles index.

 

What’s New | Services | Resources | Tax Centre
About Nevcon | Contact Nevcon | Privacy | Site Map | Home
© 2008 Nevcon Accounting Services